61
3.
and it would be idle for me to deny that such measures wikl,
I fear, prove highly inconvenient to adopt a mild expression
But "needs must": to Hongkong and very expensive for us.
Finally, in regard to the suggestion that a "guid
"pro quo" should take the form of some practical scheme for
"the suppression of Piracy .... preferably under the auspices
"of the Customs organisation working in cooperation with the
"British Authorities in Hongkong," this appears to me to intro-
duce a politicial and/or military element into the discussion
which had better be left out? I believe that Chinese and
British cooperation in the matter of the suppression of Piracy
is essential and could probably be arranged, but I do not
consider that the Customs can properly be associated with
such an enterprise. And I fear, moreover, that if Hongkong
insists that a ready-made semi-Customs scheme for the suppres-
sion of Piracy must precede the acceptance of the Agreement
another deadlock is almost certain to result, in which case
we may be reluctantly compelled to resort to independent
action, as mentioned above. I trust, therefore, that this
new obstacle in connection with the Agreement will not arise
that is, I feel that it would be better to keep the two questions (Piracy and Agreement) separate, although I fully agree that Great Britain is justified in expecting China to do her part in endeavouring to remove this scourge (Piracy).
I /
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.